J/MNRAS/513/788        MW field and cluster RR Lyrae stars     (Garofalo+, 2022)

New LZ and PW(Z) relations of RR Lyrae stars calibrated with Gaia EDR3 parallaxes. Garofalo A., Delgado H.E., Sarro L.M., Clementini G., Muraveva T., Marconi M., Ripepi V. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 513, 788-806 (2022)> =2022MNRAS.513..788G 2022MNRAS.513..788G (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Milky Way ; Clusters, globular ; Stars, standard ; Stars, variable ; Positional data ; Parallaxes, trigonometric ; Photometry ; Optical ; Extinction ; Abundances, [Fe/H] Keywords: methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - parallaxes - stars: variables: RR Lyrae - globular clusters: general Abstract: We present new luminosity-metallicity (LZ ; MV-[Fe/H] and MG-[Fe/H]) and relations and, for the first time, empirical, Gaia three-band (G, GBP, GRP) period-Wesenheit-metallicity (PWZ) relations of RR Lyrae stars (RRLs) derived using a hierarchical Bayesian approach and new accurate parallaxes published for these variables in the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3). In a previous study, we obtained Bayesian hierarchically derived LZ relations from a sample of about four hundred Milky Way field RRLs with G-band light curves and trigonometric parallaxes published in the Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2), using V mean magnitudes, metallicities, absorptions, and pulsation periods available in the literature. We now extend that study in two directions. First, we update our previous results using trigonometric parallaxes from Gaia EDR3 and incorporate the Bayesian analysis of a first empirical PWZ relation derived using those field RRLs with G, GBP and GRP time-series photometry available in Gaia DR2. Secondly, we use Bayesian inference to derive LZ relations and empirical PW Gaia three-band relations from 385 RRLs belonging to 15 Milky Way globular clusters (GC) with literature-compiled spectroscopic metallicities ranging from -0.36 to -2.39 dex and prior distances extending from 2.2 to 41.2 kpc. From the samples of RRLs analysed in this paper we infer a mean Gaia EDR3 zero-point offset of -0.028 mas with median values ranging from -0.033 (LZ and PWZ models for field stars) to -0.024 mas (LZ model in the V band for GC RRLs). Description: To further investigate the metallicity dependence of the LZ and PW(Z) relations we have exploited the EDR3 parallaxes available for RRLs in two different environments: the MW field and a sample of Galactic globular clusters (GCs). In this paper, we thus present new LZ(MV-[Fe/H] and MG-[Fe/H]) and PWZ(PW(G,GBP,GRP)Z) relations obtained for field RRLs and new LZ(MV-[Fe/H] and MG-[Fe/H]) and PW relations obtained for cluster RRLs, using a hierarchical Bayesian inference and the new and accurate Gaia EDR3 parallaxes of these variable stars, (i.e see section Introduction for more details). We construct two separate data samples: RRLs in the MW field and in Galactic GCs used for the derivation of the corresponding LZ relations in the V and G passbands and PWZ relations in the Gaia G, GBP, and GRP bands. First, as explained in the section 2.1 Field RR Lyrae stars, we have built our field RRL sample starting from the 401 MW RRLs analysed in Muraveva et al. (2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M, Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195) which were based on the Dambis et al. (2013MNRAS.435.3206D 2013MNRAS.435.3206D, Cat. J/MNRAS/435/3206) sample. We first replaced their Gaia DR2 parallaxes with the new EDR3 values, which are available for the whole sample. To restrict the sample of field RRLs used to calibrate the LZ and PLZ relations only to sources with best-quality parallaxes we took into account the re-normalized unit weight error (RUWE) (Lindegren 2018, http://www.rssd.esa.int/doc_fetch.php?id=3757412) and retained only sources satisfying the condition ruwe < 1.4. We provide information for the complete data-set of 291 MW field RRLs in tablea1.dat. To derive the MV-[Fe/H] and MG-[Fe/H] relations, among the 291 field RRLs, we have used 274 sources having V magnitude (i.e refer to section 4.2 MV-[Fe/H] relation) and 223 sources with G magnitude (i.e refer to section 4.3 MG-[Fe/H] relation), respectively. A subsample of 190 field RRLs having G, GBP, and GRP magnitudes were instead used to infer the PW(G,GBP,GRP)Z relation (i.e refer to section 4.4 PWZ relations). Secondly, as explicited in the section 2.2 RR Lyrae stars in Globular Clusters, we select a sample of 15 Galactic GCs with distances ranging from a few to ∼41 kpc around the Galactic centre and spatially distributed. According to the literature, the selected GCs host a total number of 709 RRLs. We cross-matched the 709 cluster RRLs against the Gaia EDR3 catalogue using a cross-match radius of 2 arcsec and retained only sources unambiguously classified by the literature as RRLs. With this filtering the GC RRL sample reduced to 643 sources. Finally, as done for the field RRLs we cleaned the GC RRLs discarding sources with ruwe => 1.4. With this latter filtering the sample was reduced to 385 stars. The complete data-set with the relevant information is summarized in tablea2.dat. As for field stars sample, we also use V and G magnitude to derive the MV-[Fe/H] and MG-[Fe/H] relations, G, GBP, and GRP magnitudes to infer the PW(G,GBP,GRP)Z relation. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file cluster.dat 10 15 Globular Clusters in our sample tablea1.dat 290 291 Galactic field RRLs used in this study tablea2.dat 263 385 Milky Way RRLs stars cluster used in this study -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/MNRAS/435/3206 : Properties of field RR Lyrae variables (Dambis+, 2013) J/MNRAS/481/1195 : Gaia DR2 RR Lyrae stars as standard candles (Muraveva+,2018) I/345 : Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration, 2018) I/350 : Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) I/358 : Gaia DR3 Part 4. Variability (Gaia Collaboration, 2022) Byte-by-byte Description of file: cluster.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 7 A7 --- Cluster Cluster name (Cluster) 9- 10 I2 --- Nbr Number of stars in the cluster -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 A9 --- Name RR Lyrae name (Name) 11- 29 I19 --- GaiaEDR3 Gaia EDR3 source ID number (sourceidEDR3) 31- 51 F21.17 deg RAdeg Barycentric right ascension of the source (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (ra_EDR3) 53- 74 F22.18 deg DEdeg Barycentric declination of the source (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (dec_EDR3) 76- 97 F22.19 mas plx Absolute stellar parallax of the source at the Ep=2016.0 (parallax) 99- 110 F12.10 mas e_plx Standard error of the stellar parallax at Ep=2016.0 (parallax_error) 112- 113 A2 --- Type [AB C] RR Lyrae subclass types (RRt) (1) 115- 120 F6.4 d P Variation period of the luminosity from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (Per) 122- 127 F6.3 mag Vmag ? Mean V magnitude from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (<Vmag>) 129- 133 F5.3 mag e_Vmag ? Mean error on Vmag from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M, Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (e_<Vmag>) 135- 139 F5.3 mag AV Extinction coefficient in V band (AV) 141- 161 F21.19 mag e_AV Mean error on Av (err_Av) 163- 180 F18.15 mag AmpGmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the G bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaverageg) 182- 202 E21.19 mag e_AmpGmag ? Mean error on AmpGmag (intaverageg_error) 204- 221 F18.15 mag AmpBPmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the BP bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaveragebp) 223- 243 E21.19 mag e_AmpBPmag ? Mean error on AmpBPmag (intaveragebp_error) 245- 262 F18.15 mag AmpRPmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the RP bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaveragerp) 264- 284 E21.19 mag e_AmpRPmag ? Mean error on AmpRPmag (intaveragerp_error) 286- 290 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H] [-2.84/0.07] Iron abundance relative to the sun from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M, Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 ([Fe/H]) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): RR Lyrae stars have two subclasses as follows: AB = ab-type with asymmetric ("saw tooth") light curves indicating that the star is pulsating in multiple modes, fundamental mode and often in the first overtone, 260 stars in our sample C = c-type with asymmetric light curves with less complexity and longer pulsation periods than AB-type light curves, 31 stars in our sample -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 7 A7 --- Cluster Cluster name (Cluster) 9- 13 A5 --- Name RR Lyrae name (Name) 15- 33 I19 --- GaiaEDR3 Gaia EDR3 source ID number (sourceidEDR3) 35- 52 F18.14 deg RAdeg Barycentric right ascension of the source (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (ra_EDR3) 54- 73 F20.16 deg DEdeg Barycentric declination of the source (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (dec_EDR3) 75- 96 F22.19 mas plx Absolute stellar parallax of the source at the Ep=2016.0 (parallax) 98-108 F11.9 mas e_plx Standard error of the stellar parallax at Ep=2016.0 (parallax_error) 110-116 A7 --- Type RR Lyrae subclass types (RRt) (1) 118-127 F10.8 d P Variation period of the luminosity from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (Per) 129-136 F8.5 mag Vmag ? Mean V magnitude from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (<Vmag>) 138-142 F5.3 mag e_Vmag ? Mean error on Vmag from Muraveva et al. 2018MNRAS.481.1195M 2018MNRAS.481.1195M, Cat. J/MNRAS/481/1195 (e_<Vmag>) 144-161 F18.15 mag AmpGmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the G bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaverageg) 163-182 E20.18 mag e_AmpGmag ? Mean error on AmpGmag (intaverageg_error) 184-201 F18.15 mag AmpBPmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the BP bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaveragebp) 203-223 E21.19 mag e_AmpBPmag ? Mean error on AmpBPmag (intaveragebp_error) 225-242 F18.15 mag AmpRPmag ? Intensity-averaged mean magnitudes in the RP bands from GaiaDR2 Cat. I/345/rrlyrae (intaveragerp) 244-263 E20.18 mag e_AmpRPmag ? Mean error on AmpRPmag (intaveragerp_error) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): RR Lyrae stars have two subclasses as follows: RRAB = ab-type with asymmetric ("saw tooth") light curves indicating that the star is pulsating in multiple modes, fundamental mode and often in the first overtone, 236 stars in our sample RRAB Bl = Similar as RRAB, 13 stars in our sample RRC = c-type with asymmetric light curves with less complexity and longer pulsation periods than AB-type light curves, 130 stars in our sample RRC Bl = Similar as RRC, 6 stars in our sample -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Luc Trabelsi [CDS] 20-Nov-2024
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line