J/MNRAS/520/2180  Clumps in galaxies in JWST SMACS0723 field (Claeyssens+, 2023)

Star formation at the smallest scales A JWST study of the clump populations in SMACS0723. Claeyssens A., Adamo A., Richard J., Mahler G., Messa M., Dessauges-Zavadsky M. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 2180-2203 (2023)> =2023MNRAS.520.2180C 2023MNRAS.520.2180C (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, galaxy ; Galaxies ; Gravitational lensing ; Photometry ; Infrared ; Positional data ; Redshifts ; Star Forming Region ; Extinction ; Stars, ages ; Abundances Keywords: gravitational lensing: strong - galaxies: high-redshift - galaxies: star clusters: general - galaxies: star formation Abstract: We present the clump populations detected in 18 lensed galaxies at redshifts 1-- 8.5 within the lensing cluster field SMACS0723. The recent JWST Early Release Observations of this poorly known region of the sky have revealed numerous point-like sources within and surrounding their host galaxies, undetected in the shallower Hubble Space Telescope images. We use JWST multi-and photometry and the lensing model of this galaxy cluster to estimate the intrinsic sizes and magnitudes of the stellar clumps. We derive optical restframe effective radii from <10 to hundreds pc and masses ranging from ∼105 to 109 M☉, overlapping with massive star clusters in the local universe. Clump ages range from 1 Myr to 1 Gyr. We compare the crossing time to the age of the clumps and determine that between 45 and 60 per cent of the detected clumps are consistent with being gravitationally bound. On average, the dearth of Gyr old clumps suggests that the dissolution time scales are shorter than 1 Gyr. We see a significant increase in the luminosity (mass) surface density of the clumps with redshift. Clumps in reionization era galaxies have stellar densities higher than star clusters in the local universe. We zoom in into single galaxies at redshift <6 and find for two galaxies, the Sparkler and the Firework, that their star clusters/clumps show distinctive colour distributions and location surrounding their host galaxy that are compatible with being accredited or formed during merger events. The ages of some of the compact clusters are between 1 and 4 Gyr, e.g. globular cluster precursors formed around 9--12 Gyr ago. Our study, conducted on a small sample of galaxies, shows the potential of JWST observations for understanding the conditions under which star clusters form in rapidly evolving galaxies. Description: In this work we use the first imaging observation acquired with the JWST of the galaxy lensing cluster SMACS J0723.3-7323 (hereafter, SMACS0723, z = 0.388 in figure of Introduction section ). This region has been previously observed with HST as part of the RELICS program. We extended our analysis to the clump populations of galaxies in the redshift range to 1 from 8. This statistical approach enables us to look at clump formation and evolution across the most important phases of galaxy growth and address key questions related to their survival timescales, as well as the capability of detecting and resolving them into their star cluster components. The used observations are taken with Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) in F090W, F150W, and F200W short wavelength (SW) and F277W, F356W, F444W long wavelength (LW) filters, covering an observed wavelength range of λobs = 0.8-5 µm, for a total of 12.5 h of integration time. The NIRspec are also used to redshift determinations. (see observations program ID 2736; PI: Pontoppidan, Pontoppidan et al. 2022ApJ...936L..14P 2022ApJ...936L..14P). To detect clumps populations, we adopt a model the galaxy cluster mass distribution surrounding our targets as a combination of dual pseudo-isothermal ellipsoids. Using a MCMC method we estimate the mass model parameters and their uncertainties (i.e more in section 3). In our case, we focus on studying stellar clumps within galaxies with a robust redshift measurement and/or a high lensing magnification factor (i.e. to get high spatial resolution on these images). A significant fraction of targeted galaxies has been selected from the multiple systems identified and used to build the lens model. Among them, we have spectroscopic redshift value measured from muse data and from the NIRSpec data. The remaining systems have a geometric redshift value obtained from the lens model optimisation. Each galaxy image has been visually inspected on NIRCam F150W and F200W filters (reference filters) to confirm that at least one stellar clump (compact source surrounded by diffuse extended emission) is clearly detected in both filters (i.e. section 4). Of the 21 multiple systems identified, we rejected 12 systems with poorly constrained redshift estimations from the lens model (with a 1σ uncertainty >0.3) and/or very faint/diffuse (S/N<3) detections in NIRCam images. In addition to the multiple systems, we include nine galaxies located outside the multiple images area, but for which we were able to measure a robust spectroscopic redshift from the available NIRSpec data. The final sample is, therefore, composed of 18 galaxies producing 36 images presented in galaxies.dat. Finally as exposed in sections 5 and 6, we proceeded to clumps identification, modelling and SED fitting to extract 228 NIRCam photometry values presented in tableb1.dat and 223 clumps SED physical properties (Reff, F150WMag, logM*, Age, E(B-V), Z) presented in tableb2.dat. Objects: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RA (2000) DE Designation(s) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07 23 13.29 -73 27 25.1 SMACS J0723.3-7327 = 1RXS J072319.7-732735 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file galaxies.dat 32 36 Selected galaxies in SMACS J0723.3-7327 cluster tableb1.dat 126 228 NIRCam photometry of our clumps sample tableb2.dat 147 223 Main astrometric informations and physical properties of our the clumps sample -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/A+A/666/A80 : Star clusters and fields in the LMC (Narloch+, 2022) J/ApJ/884/85 : RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey (Coe+, 2019) J/ApJ/686/948 : CO in extragalactic giant molecular clouds (Bolatto+,2008) J/ApJ/499/112 : HST CFRS and LDSS redshift surveys. I. (Brinchmann+ 1998) J/ApJS/157/1 : Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (Gladders+, 2005) J/AJ/140/75 : Antennae galaxies (NGC 4038/4039) revisited (Whitmore+, 2010) J/ApJS/107/1 : Morphologies of distant galaxies II (Abraham+ 1996) J/other/NatAs/2.76 : MACSJ1206.2-08474714 clumps photometry (Cava+, 2018) I/350 : Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) Byte-by-byte Description of file: galaxies.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 A5 --- Img Galaxy images name identifier (ImageID) 7- 8 I2 h RAh Right ascension of the component (J2000) 10- 11 I2 min RAm Right ascension of the component (J2000) 13- 17 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension of the component (J2000) 19 A1 --- DE- Declination sign of the component (J2000) 20- 21 I2 deg DEd Declination of the component (J2000) 23- 24 I2 arcmin DEm Declination of the component (J2000) 26- 29 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination of the component (J2000) 31- 32 I2 --- Nclump Number of clumps identified in galaxy image -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 A5 --- Img Image name identifier (ImageID) 7- 11 A5 --- Clump Clump name identifier (ClumpID) 13- 18 F6.4 --- z Redshift (z) 20- 29 F10.6 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) (RA) 31- 40 F10.6 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) (DEC) 42- 47 F6.2 --- mu Lensing magnification factor (µ) 49- 54 F6.2 --- E_mu Upper uncertainty of mu 56- 60 F5.2 --- e_mu Lower uncertainty of mu 62- 66 F5.2 mag F090Wmag The JWST NIRCam F090W magnitude in AB system (F090W) 68- 71 F4.2 mag e_F090Wmag Uncertainty of F090Wmag 73- 77 F5.2 mag F150Wmag The JWST NIRCam F150W magnitude in AB system (F150W) 79- 82 F4.2 mag e_F150Wmag Uncertainty of F150Wmag 84- 88 F5.2 mag F200Wmag The JWST NIRCam F200W magnitude in AB system (F200W) 90- 93 F4.2 mag e_F200Wmag Uncertainty of F200Wmag 95- 99 F5.2 mag F277Wmag The JWST NIRCam F277W magnitude in AB system (F277W) 101-104 F4.2 mag e_F277Wmag Uncertainty of F277Wmag 106-110 F5.2 mag F356Wmag The JWST NIRCam F356W magnitude in AB system (F356W) 112-115 F4.2 mag e_F356Wmag Uncertainty of F356Wmag 117-121 F5.2 mag F444Wmag The JWST NIRCam F444W magnitude in AB system (F444W) 123-126 F4.2 mag e_F444Wmag Uncertainty of F444Wmag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 A5 --- Img Image name identifier (ImageID) 7- 11 A5 --- Clump Clump name identifier (ClumpID) 13- 18 F6.4 --- z Redshift (z) 20- 29 F10.6 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) (RA) 31- 40 F10.6 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) (DEC) 42- 47 F6.2 --- mu Lensing magnification factor (µ) 50- 55 F6.2 --- E_mu Upper uncertainty of mu 58- 62 F5.2 --- e_mu Lower uncertainty of mu 64 A1 --- l_Reff Upper limit flag on Reff values 66- 68 I3 pc Reff Intrinsic effective radius measured on NIRCam/F150W with method described in section 5.3 (Reff) 71- 73 I3 pc E_Reff ? Upper uncertainty of Reff 76- 78 I3 pc e_Reff ? Lower uncertainty of Reff 80- 85 F6.2 mag F150WMag The NIRCam/F150W intrinsic absolute magnitude in AB system (F150Wabs) 87- 90 F4.2 mag e_F150WMag Uncertainty of F150WMag 92- 94 F3.1 [Msun] logM* ? Derived stellar mass with SED analysis reference model explained in section 5 and 6 (logM*) 97- 99 F3.1 [Msun] E_logM* ? Upper uncertainty of logM* 102-104 F3.1 [Msun] e_logM* ? Lower uncertainty of logM* 106-109 I4 Myr Age ? Estimated age with SED analysis reference model explained in section 5 and 6 (Age) 112-115 I4 Myr E_Age ? Upper uncertainty of Age 118-121 I4 Myr e_Age ? Lower uncertainty of Age 123-126 F4.2 mag E(B-V) ? Estimated extinction with SED analysis reference model explained in section 5 and 6 (EB-V) 129-132 F4.2 mag E_E(B-V) ? Upper uncertainty of E (B-V) 135-138 F4.2 mag e_E(B-V) ? Lower uncertainty of E (B-V) 140 A1 --- n_E(B-V) Note for clumps with an E(B-V) value at fitted with no extinction 142-147 F6.4 --- Z ? Best estimates of the metallicity fixed to for SED fits either at 0.02, 0.008, 0.004 or 0.0004 (Metallicity) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal License: CC-BY-4.0 [see https://spdx.org/licenses/]
(End) Luc Trabelsi [CDS] 12-Mar-2026
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line