J/MNRAS/538/3284      3D NLTE abundances of metals                (Storm+, 2025)

Observational constraints on the origin of the elements. IX. 3D NLTE abundances of metals in the context of Galactic Chemical Evolution Models and 4MOST. Storm N., Bergemann M., Eitner P., Hoppe R., Kemp A.J., Ruiter A.J., Janka H.-T., Sieverding A., De Mink S.E., Seitenzahl I.R., Owusu E.K. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 538, 3284 (2025)> =2025MNRAS.538.3284S 2025MNRAS.538.3284S (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Spectroscopy ; Abundances ; Milky Way ; Models, atmosphere Keywords: line: formation - radiative transfer - stars: abundances - stars: atmospheres - Galaxy: disc - Galaxy: evolution Abstract: Historically, various methods have been employed to understand the origin of the elements, including observations of elemental abundances which have been compared to Galactic Chemical Evolution (GCE) models. It is also well known that 1D Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) measurements fail to accurately capture elemental abundances. Non-LTE (NLTE) effects may play a significant role, and neglecting them leads to erroneous implications in galaxy modelling. In this paper, we calculate 3D NLTE abundances of seven key iron-peak and neutron-capture elements (Mn, Co, Ni, Sr, Y, Ba, Eu) based on carefully assembled 1D LTE literature measurements, and investigate their impact within the context of the OMEGA+ GCE model. Our findings reveal that 3D NLTE abundances are significantly higher for iron-peak elements at [Fe/H]←3, with (for the first time ever) [Ni/Fe] and (confirming previous studies) [Co/Fe] on average reaching 0.6-0.8dex, and [Mn/Fe] reaching -0.1dex, which current 1D core-collapse supernova (CCSN) models cannot explain. We also observe a slightly higher production of neutron-capture elements at low metallicities, with 3D NLTE abundances of Eu being higher by +0.2dex at [Fe/H]=-3. 3D effects are most significant for iron-peak elements in the very metal-poor regime, with average differences between 3D NLTE and 1D NLTE reaching up to 0.15dex. Thus, ignoring 3D NLTE effects introduces significant biases, so including them should be considered whenever possible. Description: In the following tables, we present the stellar parameters and 1D LTE abundances of the stars taken from the literature, as well as our the 3D NLTE corrected abundances for the elements Mn, Co, Ni, Sr, Y, Ba, and Eu, and 1D NLTE abundances for C based on CH G-band measurements. Fe abundances are corrected for 3D LTE effects, except for Bensby's and Hansen's stars, which are 1D NLTE. We also present 1D LTE equivalent widths (EW) for synthetic spectra of MARCS models, and 3D LTE and NLTE equivalent widths for synthetic spectra of STAGGER models. The equivalent widths can be used to calculate the corrections for 3D NLTE effects. See also: File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file all_data.dat 148 746 Stellar parameters and abundances of the stars taken from the literature ew1dlte.dat 42 1673370 Calculated equivalent widths (EW) in 1D LTE for synthetic spectra of MARCS models ew_3d.dat 43 42525 Calculated equivalent widths (EW) in 3D LTE and NLTE for synthetic spectra of STAGGER models -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: all_data.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 12 A12 --- Name Stellar name, as in the original source 14- 19 F6.1 K Teff Effective temperature 21- 24 F4.2 [cm/s2] logg Surface gravity 26- 31 F6.3 [-] [Fe/H] Abundance ratio Fe/H 3D LTE/1D NLTE (1) 33- 36 F4.2 km/s vmic Microturbulence velocity ξ 38- 43 F6.3 [-] [Mn/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Mn/Fe in 1D LTE 45- 50 F6.3 [-] [Mn/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Mn/Fe in 3D NLTE 52- 57 F6.3 [-] [Co/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Co/Fe in 1D LTE 59- 64 F6.3 [-] [Co/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Co/Fe in 3D NLTE 66- 71 F6.3 [-] [Ni/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Ni/Fe in 1D LTE 73- 78 F6.3 [-] [Ni/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Ni/Fe in 3D NLTE 80- 85 F6.3 [-] [Sr/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Sr/Fe in 1D LTE 87- 92 F6.3 [-] [Sr/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Sr/Fe in 3D NLTE 94- 98 F5.2 [-] [Y/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Y/Fe in 1D LTE 100-105 F6.3 [-] [Y/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Y/Fe in 3D NLTE 107-112 F6.3 [-] [Ba/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Ba/Fe in 1D LTE 114-119 F6.3 [-] [Ba/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Ba/Fe in 3D NLTE 121-125 F5.2 [-] [Eu/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio Eu/Fe in 1D LTE 127-132 F6.3 [-] [Eu/Fe]3D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio Eu/Fe in 3D NLTE 134-139 F6.3 [-] [C/Fe]1D-LTE ? Abundance ratio C/Fe in 1D LTE 141-146 F6.3 [-] [C/Fe]1D-NLTE ? Abundance ratio C/Fe in 1D NLTE 148 A1 --- Ref Literature source of the data (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): 1D NLTE for sources 0 and 2, 3D LTE otherwise Note (2): Literature source of the data as follows: 0 = Bensby et al., 2014A&A...562A..71B 2014A&A...562A..71B, Cat. J/A+A/562/A71 ; Battistini & Bensby, 2015A&A...577A...9B 2015A&A...577A...9B, Cat. J/A+A/577/A9, 2016A&A...586A..49B 2016A&A...586A..49B, Cat. J/A+A/586/A49 1 = Bonifacio et al., 2009A&A...501..519B 2009A&A...501..519B, Cat. J/A+A/501/519 2 = Hansen et al., 2013A&A...551A..57H 2013A&A...551A..57H 3 = Li et al., 2022ApJ...931..147L 2022ApJ...931..147L, Cat. J/ApJ/931/147 4 = Mardini et al., 2024MNRAS.528.2912M 2024MNRAS.528.2912M 5 = Zhao et al., 2016ApJ...833..225Z 2016ApJ...833..225Z, Cat. J/ApJ/833/225 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: ew1dlte.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 A2 --- Element Element symbol 4- 7 I4 0.1nm Line Wavelength in Angstroms 9- 12 F4.1 [-] [X/Fe] Abundance ratio X/Fe 14- 17 I4 K Teff Effective temperature 19- 21 F3.1 [cm/s2] logg Surface gravity 23- 26 F4.1 [-] [Fe/H] Abundance ratio Fe/H 28- 31 F4.2 km/s vmic Microturbulence velocity ξ 33- 42 F10.6 0.1pm EW-1D-LTE Equivalent width in 1D LTE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: ew_3d.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 A2 --- Element Element symbol 4- 7 I4 0.1nm Line Wavelength in Angstroms 9- 13 F5.2 [-] [X/Fe] Abundance ratio X/Fe 15- 18 I4 K Teff Effective temperature 20- 22 F3.1 [cm/s2] logg Surface gravity 24- 27 F4.1 [-] [Fe/H] Abundance ratio Fe/H 29- 35 F7.3 0.1pm EW-3D-LTE Equivalent width in 3D LTE 37- 43 F7.3 0.1pm EW-3D-NLTE Equivalent width in 3D NLTE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Nicholas Storm, storm(at)mpia.de
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 29-Apr-2025
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line