J/PASJ/73/817       weak lensing shear-selected cluster samples   (Oguri+, 2021)

Hundreds of weak lensing shear-selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S19A data. Oguri M., Miyazaki S., Li X., Luo W., Mitsuishi I., Miyatake H., More S., Nishizawa A.J., Okabe N., Ota N., Plazas Malagon A.A., Utsumi Y. <Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 73, 817 (2021)> =2021PASJ...73..817O 2021PASJ...73..817O (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, galaxy ; Gravitational lensing ; Redshifts ; Optical Keywords: galaxies: clusters: general - (cosmology:) dark matter - (cosmology:) large-scale structure of universe - gravitational lensing: weak Abstract: We use the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S19A shape catalog to construct weak lensing shear-selected cluster samples. From aperture mass maps covering ∼510deg2 created using a truncated Gaussian filter, we construct a catalog of 187 shear-selected clusters that correspond to mass map peaks with signal-to-noise ratio larger than 4.7. Most of the shear-selected clusters have counterparts in optically selected clusters, from which we estimate the purity of the catalog to be higher than 95%. The sample can be expanded to 418 shear-selected clusters with the same signal-to-noise ratio cut by optimizing the shape of the filter function and by combining weak lensing mass maps created with several different background galaxy selections. We argue that dilution and obscuration effects of cluster member galaxies can be mitigated by using background source galaxy samples and adopting a filter function with its inner boundary larger than about 2'. The large samples of shear-selected clusters that are selected without relying on any baryonic tracer are useful for detailed studies of cluster astrophysics and cosmology. Description: We present updated catalogs of weak lensing shear-selected clusters from the latest HSC-SSP S19A shape catalog covering ∼433deg2 (X. Li et al. in preparation). We construct catalogs using three different approaches adopting different shapes of filters. We also assign redshifts of individual clusters by cross-matching the shear-selected clusters with optically selected clusters. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 302 187 HSC S19A shear-selected cluster catalog with TG15 set-up table2.dat 306 418 HSC S19A shear-selected cluster catalog with TI05 set-up table3.dat 306 200 HSC S19A shear-selected cluster catalog with TI20 set-up -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/ApJS/199/34 : Clusters of galaxies in SDSS-III (Wen+, 2012) J/ApJ/785/104 : redMaPPer. I. Algorithm applied to SDSS DR8 (Rykoff+, 2014) J/MNRAS/444/147 : Richness of galaxy clusters (Oguri, 2014) J/ApJ/807/178 : Newly rich galaxy clusters identified in SDSS-DR12 (Wen+, 2015) J/A+A/638/A114 : CODEX galaxy clusters catalog (Finoguenov+, 2020) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- ID [1/187] Sequential number 6- 10 F5.3 --- S/N Signal-to-noise ratio 12- 20 F9.5 deg RAdeg Mass map peak right ascension (J2000) 22- 30 F9.5 deg DEdeg Mass map peak declination (J2000) 32- 36 F5.3 --- z Primary-match cluster redshift 38 I1 --- r_z [1/4]?=0 Source of primary-match cluster redshift (G1) 40- 45 F6.2 --- LambdaCa1 ?=0 CAMIRA match (1), richness 47- 51 F5.3 --- zCa1 ?=0 CAMIRA match (1), redshift 53- 57 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa1 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 59- 64 F6.2 --- LambdaCa2 ?=0 CAMIRA match (2), richness 66- 70 F5.3 --- zCa2 ?=0 CAMIRA match (2), redshift 72- 76 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa2 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 78- 83 F6.2 --- LambdaCa3 ?=0 CAMIRA match (3), richness 85- 89 F5.3 --- zCa3 ?=0 CAMIRA match (3), redshift 91- 95 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa3 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 97-102 F6.2 --- LambdarP1 ?=0 redMaPPer match (1), richness 104-108 F5.3 --- zrP1 ?=0 redMaPPer match (1), redshift 110-114 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP1 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 116-121 F6.2 --- LambdarP2 ?=0 redMaPPer match (2), richness 123-127 F5.3 --- zrP2 ?=0 redMaPPer match (2), redshift 129-133 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP2 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 135-140 F6.2 --- LambdarP3 ?=0 redMaPPer match (3), richness 142-146 F5.3 --- zrP3 ?=0 redMaPPer match (3), redshift 148-152 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP3 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 154-159 F6.2 --- LambdaW1 ?=0 WHL15 match (1), richness 161-165 F5.3 --- zW1 ?=0 WHL15 match (1), redshift 167-171 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW1 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 173-178 F6.2 --- LambdaW2 ?=0 WHL15 match (2), richness 180-184 F5.3 --- zW2 ?=0 WHL15 match (2), redshift 186-190 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW2 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 192-197 F6.2 --- LambdaW13 ?=0 WHL15 match (3), richness 199-203 F5.3 --- zW3 ?=0 WHL15 match (3), redshift 205-209 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW3 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 211-216 F6.2 10+37W LXCo1 ?=0 CODEX match (1), X-ray luminosity 218-222 F5.3 --- zCo1 ?=0 CODEX match (1), redshift 224-228 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo1 ?=9.999 CODEX match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 230-235 F6.2 10+37W LXCo2 ?=0 CODEX match (2), X-ray luminosity 237-241 F5.3 --- zCo2 ?=0 CODEX match (2), redshift 243-247 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo2 ?=9.999 CODEX match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 249-254 F6.2 10+37W LXCo3 ?=0 CODEX match (3), X-ray luminosity 256-260 F5.3 --- zCo3 ?=0 CODEX match (3), redshift 262-266 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo3 ?=9.999 CODEX match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 268-272 F5.2 10+14Msun M500c Best-fit mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 274-278 F5.2 10+14Msun e_M500c Lower limit of 1 sigma confidence level of mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 280-284 F5.2 10+14Msun E_M500c Upper limit of 1 sigma confidence level of mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 286-290 F5.2 --- c500c Best-fit concentration parameter c_500c 292-296 F5.2 --- e_c500c Lower limit of 1 sigma confidence level of concentration parameter c_500c 298-302 F5.2 --- E_c500c Upper limit of 1 sigma confidence level of concentration parameter c_500c -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- ID [1/418] Sequential number 5- 10 F6.3 --- S/N Signal-to-noise ratio 12- 14 F3.1 --- zmin Minimum redshift of the mass map from which this peak is selected 16- 24 F9.5 deg RAdeg Mass map peak right ascension (J2000) 26- 34 F9.5 deg DEdeg Mass map peak declination (J2000) 36- 40 F5.3 --- z Primary-match cluster redshift 42 I1 --- r_z [1/4]?=0 Source of primary-match cluster redshift (G1) 44- 49 F6.2 --- LambdaCa1 ?=0 CAMIRA match (1), richness 51- 55 F5.3 --- zCa1 ?=0 CAMIRA match (1), redshift 57- 61 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa1 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 63- 68 F6.2 --- LambdaCa2 ?=0 CAMIRA match (2), richness 70- 74 F5.3 --- zCa2 ?=0 CAMIRA match (2), redshift 76- 80 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa2 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 82- 87 F6.2 --- LambdaCa3 ?=0 CAMIRA match (3), richness 89- 93 F5.3 --- zCa3 ?=0 CAMIRA match (3), redshift 95- 99 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCa3 ?=9.999 CAMIRA match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 101-106 F6.2 --- LambdarP1 ?=0 redMaPPer match (1), richness 108-112 F5.3 --- zrP1 ?=0 redMaPPer match (1), redshift 114-118 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP1 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 120-125 F6.2 --- LambdarP2 ?=0 redMaPPer match (2), richness 127-131 F5.3 --- zrP2 ?=0 redMaPPer match (2), redshift 133-137 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP2 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 139-144 F6.2 --- LambdarP3 ?=0 redMaPPer match (3), richness 146-150 F5.3 --- zrP3 ?=0 redMaPPer match (3), redshift 152-156 F5.3 Mpc DistTrrP3 ?=9.999 redMaPPer match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 158-163 F6.2 --- LambdaW1 ?=0 WHL15 match (1), richness 165-169 F5.3 --- zW1 ?=0 WHL15 match (1), redshift 171-175 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW1 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 177-182 F6.2 --- LambdaW2 ?=0 WHL15 match (2), richness 184-188 F5.3 --- zW2 ?=0 WHL15 match (2), redshift 190-194 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW2 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 196-201 F6.2 --- LambdaW3 ?=0 WHL15 match (3), richness 203-207 F5.3 --- zW3 ?=0 WHL15 match (3), redshift 209-213 F5.3 Mpc DistTrW3 ?=9.999 WHL15 match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 215-220 F6.2 10+37W LXCo1 ?=0 CODEX match (1), X-ray luminosity 222-226 F5.3 --- zCo1 ?=0 CODEX match (1), redshift 228-232 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo1 ?=9.999 CODEX match (1), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 234-239 F6.2 10+37W LXCo2 ?=0 CODEX match (2), X-ray luminosity 241-245 F5.3 --- zCo2 ?=0 CODEX match (2), redshift 247-251 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo2 ?=9.999 CODEX match (2), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 253-258 F6.2 10+37W LXCo3 ?=0 CODEX match (3), X-ray luminosity 260-264 F5.3 --- zCo3 ?=0 CODEX match (3), redshift 266-270 F5.3 Mpc DistTrCo3 ?=9.999 CODEX match (3), transverse distance (on Mpc/h unit) 272-276 F5.2 10+14Msun M500c Best-fit mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 278-282 F5.2 10+14Msun e_M500c Lower limit of 1 sigma confidence level of mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 284-288 F5.2 10+14Msun E_M500c Upper limit of 1 sigma confidence level of mass M_500c [in 1014Msun/h unit) 290-294 F5.2 --- c500c Best-fit concentration parameter c_500c 296-300 F5.2 --- e_c500c Lower limit of 1 sigma confidence level of concentration parameter c_500c 302-306 F5.2 --- E_c500c Upper limit of 1 sigma confidence level of concentration parameter c_500c -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global notes: Note (G1): Source of primary-match cluster redshift as follows: 1 = CAMIRA, CAMIRA algorithm (Oguri, 2014MNRAS.444..147O 2014MNRAS.444..147O, Cat. J/MNRAS/444/147) 2 = redMaPPer, redMaPPer cluster catalog (Rykoff et al., 2014ApJ...785..104R 2014ApJ...785..104R, Cat. J/ApJ/785/104) 3 = WHL, WHL15 cluster catalog (Wen et al., 2012ApJS..199...34W 2012ApJS..199...34W, Cat. J/ApJS/199/34; Wen & Han, 2015ApJ...807..178W 2015ApJ...807..178W, Cat. J/ApJ/807/178) 4 = CODEX, CODEX cluster catalog (Finoguenov et al., 2020A&A...638A.114F 2020A&A...638A.114F, Cat. J/A+A/638/A114) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 29-Jul-2025
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line