Astron. Astrophys. 362, 673-682 (2000)
4. Consistency checks with other observational facts
We now check whether further observational facts that were not
included in the simultaneous analysis, such as line ratios,
Strömgren indices, and period change, are consistent with the
model produced by the least-squares solution.
![[TABLE]](img119.gif)
Table 5. Parameters derived from the radial velocities and the light curves with the Levenberg-Marquart algorithm and free mass ratio. and denote the Roche potentials, and the filling factors indicating that BF Aur is detached. The second line specifies the standard deviations of the estimated parameters. The solution in this table is referred to as solution 1 .
![[TABLE]](img128.gif)
Table 6. Parameters derived from the radial velocities and the light curves with the Levenberg-Marquart algorithm and free mass ratio. and denote the Roche potentials, and the filling factors indicating that BF Aur is detached. The second line specifies the standard deviations of the eastimated parameters. The solution in this table is referred to as solution 2 .
![[TABLE]](img137.gif)
Table 7. Full parameter set describing the adopted light curve solution for BF Aur, together with estimated uncertaintities of the main parameters. measures the relative difference of the mean effective temperatures, J is the surface brightness. and denote the fill-out parameter . S and V denote surface area and volume. k is the ratio of the mean radii.
4.1. The spectral line ratio of He i 438.7 nm
As the components have almost equal temperatures (with
) and similar surface gravities the
line-strength ratio should compare well with the luminosity ratio
. Popper (1981) reproduced
microphotometer tracings of the spectra of 26 OB eclipsing binaries in
the wavelength range 430-450 nm. The BF Aur spectrogram illustrated in
his Fig. 7 corresponds to phase 0:p70, i.e., the component
eclipsed at primary minimum is receding. Lines of both stars are
clearly present, the redshifted components all being the weaker ones.
From and He i 438.7, Kallrath &
Kämper (1992) estimated a line ratio of roughly
, in agreement with the statement
made already by Mammano et al. (1974) (but ignored by later
investigators) that the spectroscopic component 2 is the one being
eclipsed at primary minimum, i.e., corresponds to the photometric
primary. Thus, KK accepted only solutions with line ratios close to
that value. Their B solutions (KK Table 1 and Table 2) had a
line ratio of about 1.2.
The line ratios of our new spectroscopic data were evaluated at
four quadrature phases for the He i line at 438.7 nm, and lead to
the line-depth ratio (primary/ secondary) of
(rms) as measured from the residual
intensities in the respective line cores. A double-Gaussian fit with
the routines supplied by the NOAO/IRAF data-reduction package yields
an equivalent-width ratio of (rms)
in good agreement with above value. The individual equivalent widths
for the star with the stronger lines are between 402-376 mÅ and
for the star with the weaker lines between 360-290 mÅ. The
average internal rms error from the two-Gaussian fits was 8 mÅ.
Fig. 1 shows a representative spectrum near quadrature. Note that
the line profiles are never completely blend free and the internal rms
error is thus likely underestimated.
Let us now compare these observational facts with the computational
results summarized in Table 8 which shows the ratio
as a function of phase
and the mass ratio q; these
values were computed with Wilson's subroutine LC. The mass ratio
( ) corresponds to the solution in
Table 5 (6).
![[TABLE]](img156.gif)
Table 8. This table shows the ratio as a function of phase and the mass ratio q; these values were computed with Wilson's subroutine LC. The mass ratio ( ) corresponds to the solution in Table 5 (6).
Compared to the observational values, the values in Table 8
slightly indicate a preference for the
solution, for which the
computational light ratio are just within the error bounds of the
observational line ratios. For the solution corresponding to
the computational values are
slightly out of the error bounds of the observational values. In
Table 3 we note that solutions for
have
and that these solutions are thus
not consistent with the observed line ratios.
4.2. The influence of the reflection effect on the solution
The influence of the reflection effect, and in particular how
significant multiple reflection is in the BF Aur system, has been
analyzed by KK and by Van Hamme (1993b). For the solution in
Table 3, we confirm again that multiple reflection is not
significant in the BF Aur system, i.e., does not change the
estimated parameters at all.
4.3. Additional information from Strömgren indices
Strömgren indices for BF Aur measured at five phases are
available from the survey by Hilditch & Hill (1975). Because the
components have almost equal temperature and similar surface
gravities, their colors will be similar and we may take the indices
measured as representative of either component, after correction for
interstellar extinction. The indices measured can be dereddened with
Crawford's (1978) intrinsic color relations for B-type stars. Taking
the slope of the reddening line in the
vs.
diagram to be 1.5, one gets a color
excess , and thereby
,
,
,
. From the color excess, we estimate
the total visual absorption . This
gives the combined visual magnitude corrected for interstellar
extinction as , and for the mean
component we get . From Moon's
(1984) empirical calibration of the intrinsic color index
in terms of the visual surface
brightness parameter , defined as
(Barnes & Evans 1976), we then
derive and
.
Various temperature calibrations with Strömgren indices lead
to closely concordant results summarized in KK. E.g., the
-calibration of Davis &
Shobbrook (1977) for luminosity class V-III, in conjunction with Code
et al.'s (1976) ( ,
)-relation gives
K,
. From interpolation in the
theoretical grids of Lester et al. (1986) we get
K and
. Finally, a photometric spectral
type may be derived from the position in the
plane, which is that of an evolved
B4-5V star.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: October 24, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |