![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 363, 887-900 (2000) 2. Candidate high frequency peakersCSS and GPS sources have convex radio spectra peaking at frequencies ranging from about hundred MHz to a few GHz; we assume/define that HFPs have similar spectral properties, with the peak occurring at a few GHz or higher frequencies. The availability of large areas covered by radio surveys, and the need of a spectral peak at high frequencies made the choice of the NVSS (Condon et al. 1998) and of the 87GB (Gregory et al. 1996) catalogues quite natural. We cross correlated the 87GB catalogue at 4.9 GHz with the NVSS
catalogue at 1.4 GHz and selected the sources with inverted spectra,
and in particular those with a slope steeper than -0.5
( The search for candidates for the bright sample started with the
1795 sources from the 87GB stronger than 300 mJy and in the region of
the sky described above. We used a simple fortran program to make a
cross correlation of the positions of these sources with the catalogue
derived from the NVSS. The error in the position for the sources in
the 87GB is much larger than that associated with the NVSS, and is
generally of the order of 10-15 arcseconds in both RA and DEC. We
considered positionally coincident the sources with difference in
either coordinate ( Table 1. Candidates observed with the VLA. All columns are self-explicative, except Column 8, where a reference to other samples is reported; a full description is given in the text. Table 1. (continued) We found 14 sources in common with the new GPS candidate starting list in Marecki et al. (1999) (`m' in Column 8), three objects are in the `bright' GPS sample from Stanghellini et al. (1998) (`st'), two sources in the `faint' GPS sample from Snellen et al. (1998) (`sn'). It has been useful to compare our list to the 550 compact extragalactic objects in Kovalev et al. (1999) (`K'), where nearly simultaneous radio spectra are available between 1 and 22 GHz. We searched our HFP candidates in the Caltech-Jodrell Bank flat-spectrum sample (Taylor et al. 1996and references therein) (`pr', `cj1' and `cj2') and with the Kellermann et al. (1998) (`k') VLBA survey at 15 GHz, in order to have images of the pc-scale radio morphology. Finally most of our HFP candidates have very short snapshot images in the VLBA Calibrator Survey (VCS, Peck & Beasley 1998). The optical ID (capitals) and redshift are from the NED database, when available. We also report our optical ID on the digitised red plates of the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS) (small `g' and `s' for extended or stellar) when no other optical information is available; a `?' following the optical identification means that the classification is uncertain. We remark that the optical magnitudes, mostly from the NED database, reported in Table 1 are not homogeneous (i.e. in the same band). Also variability plays an important role, given that a significant fraction of the sources are associated with blazars. In fact among the candidates there are also 3 BL Lac objects from the 1 Jy sample (Stickel et al. 1991) and a few other sources known to be variable.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000 Online publication: December 5, 2000 ![]() |