 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 515-524 (1997)
4. Structure function analysis
In this section we study the short term fluctuations of angular
velocites by employing structure function analysis (Lindsey & Chie
1976; Cordes & Downs 1985). This technique is more sensitive to
sharp fluctuations. Therefore it is more likely to show the effects of
a possible decoupling between the crust and the superfluid core. A
first order structure function for the angular velocity time series
can be defined as
![[EQUATION]](img61.gif)
For a random walk in frequency one can express the time series
as
![[EQUATION]](img62.gif)
where is the step size of events
is the step function and
is the events occur at random times with a rate R. The
structure function of the above equation can be written as (Cordes
1985),
![[EQUATION]](img66.gif)
where t is the lag between two measurments of
, S is the random walk noise
strength.
If the neutron star has significiant superfluid in the core (Lamb
et al., 1978a, b; Sauls 1988; Lamb 1991; Datta & Alpar 1993) then
the moment of inertia of a neutron star resides mainly in its neutron
superfluid core. There is a neutron superfluid also in the inner part
of the crust lattice. This crust neutron superfluid carries
of the stars's moment of inertia, and is
coupled to the rest of the crust on very long time scales, typically
extending to years (Alpar et al., 1981; Alpar et al., 1993). The crust
superfluid moment of inertia is resolved in radio pulsars which are
spinning down due to electromagnetic dipole radiation, as a sudden
changes in rotation rate (or glitch events) with a magnitude
and its time derivative
(Lyne 1993; Shemar 1993). These kind of glitches can not be detected
in the accretion powered X-ray binaries because the external torque
noise in these systems dominates (Baykal & Swank 1996). Also the
internal dynamics of radio pulsars spinning down may be quite
different (Alpar 1993). In this work we will not be concerned with the
crust superfluid. In the core of the neutron star, the rotating
neutron superfluid is coupled to the stellar crust by interactions
between the charged particles (electrons and protons) and the
quantized vortices. In the case of any change in rotation velocity of
the crust the whole charged component (protons, electrons) of the
stellar interior is coupled to the crust on a short time scale,
typically less than (Easson 1979). The angular
velocity of the neutron superfluid is determined by the density of
quantized vortices. The rotation velocity of the core neutron
superfluid will not change unless the quantized vortex lines move
radially (outward for spin-down and inward for spin-up). Any
fluctuation on the crust creates a force on the vortices because of
the relative velocity between the vortex line and charged component.
Vortex lines relax with charged particles at dynamical (or at the
crust core coupling time ) time scales, which is
of the order of , where P is the rotation
period of the neutron star, is the change in
mass of proton as a result of its coupling with neutrons (Alpar et
al., 1984; Alpar & Sauls 1988).
The above senario can be approximated with a two component neutron
star model (Baym et al., 1969). In this model, one component is the
crust-charge particle system, which consists of protons, electrons and
the crust with an inertia with rotates with
angular velocity . The second component is the
core neutron superfluid, with moment of inertia
, with rotates with angular velocity
. Any external torque on the crust creates a lag
between and . The two
components are coupled by a crust core coupling time
,
![[EQUATION]](img80.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img81.gif)
Here is the external torque exerted on the
star. From the power spectra in the previous section we found that
fluctuations are consistent with white torque
noise. We assume that external torque fluctuations are also white
noise , where is the
angular momentum added or subtracted from the star at
. Then the fluctuations of the crust can be
expressed (Baykal et al., 1991) as
![[EQUATION]](img86.gif)
where is the moment of inertia of the
neutron star. If the neutron star response purely rigid
or then the time series
behave as a pure random walk in angular velocity (see Eq. 5).
By using the definition of the structure function for the time
series above and defining the , then the mean
square fluctuation of the white noise variable can be written as
![[EQUATION]](img91.gif)
where . At long time lag
, angular accelerations fluctuations behaves as
, while at short time lag
behaves as . This means that in the long time
lag limit, the core superfluid couples to the neutron star crust and
responds to the external torque with total moment of intertia
I. On the other hand in the short time lag neutron star
responds to external fluctuations with crust moment of inertia
(or with charged particle components) (see also
Lamb et al., 1978a, b). In Fig. 5a, we plotted the angular
acceleration fluctuations in the case of core superfluid mixture
for a crust core coupling time
day. In the plot we adapted the noise strength
value (S) from the power spectrum as
rad2 /sec3. As it is seen from Fig. 5a, if
there is a significant core superfluidity and even if the crust core
coupling time is relatively short day, the
crust response increases the angular acceleration fluctuations up to
time lags of tens of days . In other words even if we do not see the
torque events on shorter time scales we can resolve the crustal moment
of inertia by measuring the angular accelerations and testing with a
simple two component neutron star model. In Fig. 5b,c, we
simulated 1000 independent time series in the form of Eq. 9, is
sampled according to the OAO 1657-415 angular velocity history (see
Fig. 2). Then we compared the angular acceleration fluctuations
with observed fluctuations. In the simulation, we sampled the events
uniformly with a rate days-1 and
used the input variance rad2
/sec2. First, we simulated the time series with
and day; the simulated
angular frequency fluctuations (with larger error bars) are shown
together with the observed fluctuations (with smaller error bars) in
Fig. 5b. Clearly the simulated fluctuations are not compatible
with the observed fluctuations. In Fig. 5c, a pure random walk
time series (or a rigid body respose with ) is
simulated. In this case, the simulated and observed angular frequency
fluctuations agreed with each other at level
at all time lags (see Fig. 5c). This indicates that the angular
acceleration fluctuations seen in OAO 1657-415, are associated with
external torques. The absence of a signature of core superfluidity is
suggesting us that either crust-core coupling time is so short (i.e.
days where
sec is the pulse period) that all charged
components and the core superfluid couple on the order of hours or the
core superfluidity is not significant . If the
latter possibility is correct, this is suggesting that either most of
the neutrons in the core are too hot to be in the superfluid phase
(Ainsworth et al., 1989) or the equation of state is stiff with higher
crustal moment of inertia (Lamb 1991). The well studied high mass X
ray binary Vela X-1 showed that less than of
the moment of inertia of the star is weakly coupled to crust with
coupling times in the range , P=283 sec
(Boynton et al., 1984; Baykal et al., 1991) while radio observations
constrain the crust core coupling time to be
(Chau 1993).
![[FIGURE]](img117.gif) |
Fig. 5a-c. a Theoretical angular accelerations for a crust core coupling time day and a ratio of core superfluid moment of inertia to crust moment of inertia . b Simulated angular accelerations (with larger error bars) with day and and observed angular accelerations. c Simulated angular accelerations for pure random walk model (larger error bars) and observed angular accelerations (see also text).
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |