![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 664-668 (1997) 3. Analysis of the observational dataIn our case, when the polarizer was successively adjusted to four
positions differing by
Here Obviously, a certain amount of white-light coronal radiation is contained in the green-line images, recorded during the eclipse, and namely the radiation which has passed through the narrow-band filter applied in our experiment. That is why, the degree of polarization, derived immediately by using Eq. (1), is deteriorated to some extent by the polarization of the white-light corona. This influence increases with distance from the solar limb and is particularly evident in the region of the north polar coronal hole. Very low radiation is detected on the green-line images in the region of this hole, but, at the same time, the degree of polarization calculated according to (1) is 30-35%. The comparison of these values with the degree of polarization observed for the white-light corona reveals that both the quantities are practically identical in the north polar region. This fact allows us to assume that over the north polar hole almost all the radiation passing through the interference narrow-band filter comes from the white-light corona and the contribution of the green line itself is negligible in this region. This evaluation and assumption alone enable us to estimate, in general, the effect of the white-light radiation on the measured green-line corona degree of polarization. In this procedure, we used the measured polarization and the
intensity of the white-light corona, as derived from the images taken
with an exposure of 1/125 s. First of all, it was necessary to reduce
the intensities calculated both for the green-line corona and the
white-light corona to a common base of relative units. By comparing
the intensities of the white-light corona with the green-line
intensities observed in the region of the north polar coronal hole, we
have found that logarithms of the white-light corona intensities are
for 0.25 higher than the corresponding values for the green-line
corona. In other words, to reduce all the intensities to a common
relative scale, it was necessary to add the value 0.25 to all the
uncorrected values of the green-line intensities observed. In this
case the ratio W of the purely green-line intensity to the
intensity of the white-light radiation is 0.8 over the north pole.
Note, that the ratio W should be understood as a ratio of the
green-line radiation to the white-light corona radiation passing
through the narrow-band filter (i.e., to the white-light corona
radiation integrated over the whole passband of the filter). On an
average, the values of the same ratio are 2.5 - 3.0 in the majority of
coronal regions around the sun, and they even increase up to 8.0 - 9.0
in the brightest regions of the green-line corona (Fig. 1). It
should perhaps be mentioned that the visible diameters of the sun and
moon differed considerably during the July 11, 1991 long-lasting
eclipse. That is why, many of the bright coronal regions situated
lower than 1.08
Since the angles of the direction of polarization of the
white-light corona and that of the green-line corona do not generally
have to be identical, it would be, in fact, necessary to subtract
vectorially the contribution of the white-light corona from the
observed polarization of the uncorrected green-line corona.
Nevertheless, in our case, we used a different procedure. Since all
the intensities measured on the four green-line images and those on
the four corresponding white-light images were reduced to a common
scale of relative intensities, we were able to subtract immediately a
contribution of the white-light radiation separately for each position
of the polarizer. The differences The maximum error in p, caused by the photometric processing of the coronal images, does not exceed 3-5%.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: July 3, 1998 ![]() |