Astron. Astrophys. 319, 694-698 (1997)
3. Results and discussions
The observed values of the percent polarization (%P) and position
angle ( ) alongwith the errors are listed in
Table 1 and are also plotted in Fig. 1. The polarimetric
data in continuum bands are already published in IAU Circular 6371
(Ganesh et al. 1996). Table 1 also lists the Geocentric distance
( ), heliocentric distance (r), and the
phase angle ( ) at the time of observations.
These values are taken from comet Ephemeris based on orbital element
given in IAU Circular 6329. As stated earlier, the observations have
been made using an aperture of diameter of 26.5 arcsec, which
corresponds to a linear scale of km and
km respectively on March 13.97 and March
18.88.
![[FIGURE]](img21.gif) |
Fig. 1. Wavelength dependence of observed degree of percent polarization (% P) and position angle ( ) for comet Hyakutake. Present observations are connected with solid line. The symbols represent Kikuchi et al. (1987) data for comet P/Halley.
|
Within the error of observations, the angle of polarization is
found independent of wavelength and also perpendicular to the
scattering plane. In other words, it is positive. The position angle
in U-band (0.365 ) shows some deviation which,
within the error of observations, appears to be insignificant.
However, the possibility of small deviation of the position angle from
the normal to scattering plane cannot be ruled out, especially for
short wavelengths, since for certain particles the polarization may be
negative (i.e. parallel to the scattering plane) for the small phase
angles (Krishnaswamy 1978; Weinberg & Beeson 1976). In such
situation the polarization vector may not be exactly perpendicular to
the scattering plane. For the present purpose we consider the position
angle, for all the three bands, to be normal to the scattering
plane.
On March 13.97 (phase angle 38.1 degrees) the degree of
polarization showed marginal decrease at wavelength 0.4845
compared to the value at 0.3650
and 0.6840 . On the other
hand, on March 18.88 (phase angle 36.9) there is a marginal increase
in wavelength dependence of polarization from 0.3650
to 0.6840 .
Though the Sun-Comet-Earth phase angle has changed only by
from March 13.97 to March 18.88 there is a
noticeable change in the wave length dependence of polarization on
these dates as is clear from Fig. 1. It appears that the
wavelength dependence of polarization is very sensitive to change in
the phase near . This point is further discussed
in Sect. 4. Kikuchi et al.(1987) have made polarization observations
on comet P/Halley using the similar IHW continuum filters covering a
wide phase angle range. It is just a coincidence that two sets of
observations from Kikuchi et al. (1987) on comet P/Halley are
phase wise very close to the present observations on comet
Hyakutake. Their polarimetric data at wavelengths 0.365 and 0.485
are available at phase angles 36.7 and 38.5
degrees which are very close to our observations on comet Hyakutake at
the phase angles of 36.9 and 38.1 degrees. They also report
observations at which is slightly different
than the waveband used by us i.e. 0.684 . As the
change in the degree of polarization with wavelength in this phase
angle region is not much, the two data sets can be used for
comparison. Comet P/Halley data (Kikuchi et al. 1987) is also plotted
in Fig. 1 for comparison.
The wavelength dependence of polarization for the two comets
appears quite similar for the above phase angles. In principle this is
expected if the comets have the same origin and the dust particles
responsible for producing polarized light are similar in nature. In
fact the polarization data at phase angle 36.7 and 38.5 for comet
P/Halley compare better with the data at phase angle at 38.1 and 36.9
degrees respectively for comet Hyakutake. The small difference in the
wavelength dependence of % P in case of the two comets at nearly the
same phase angle may be due to various reasons. Firstly, the aperture
sizes used in the observations, which correspond to the different
linear scales on the comets, are different in the present observations
from those used by Kikuchi et al. (1987) for comet P/Halley. Small but
systematic differences are noticed in the polarization values for the
same phase angle when observed through different aperture sizes which
map different linear scales at the comet location (Bastein et al.
1986). Secondly, comets are active objects in the sense that ejection
of dust and gas is a continuous process and some strong ejection
episodes may change the environment considerably but temporarily.
Strong ejections, not uncommon in comets, may change the dust size
distribution which in turn changes the polarization behaviour. Also,
the possibility of radial dependence of the dust size distribution can
not be ruled out.
Within these limitations, the observed wavelength dependence of
polarization for comets P/Halley and Hyakutake appears similar which
can be taken to be indicative of the similar nature of the grains in
the two comets. In the following section we have attempted to compare
the observed polarization behaviour with the theoretically calculated
ones as well as with the data on other comets, especially the comet
P/Halley.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997
Online publication: July 3, 1998
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |