Astron. Astrophys. 363, 947-957 (2000)
4. Corrections
A large program has been underway for some years now, to determine
the space velocities of nearby stars. the author was kindly lent some
data from this project by Andersen & Nordström (private
communication). For all but 33 of the stars left in the sample there
are velocity data and calculated orbits (described in Fux 1997). These
data are based on the same absolute magnitudes as the results
presented here.
With these data it is possible to make an in-depth study of the
scale height weighting problem. As theoretical models usually concern
a cylinder around the sun and the observed sample is confined to the
solar neighbourhood, some correction must be made. This is usually
done by weighting the sample according to the average
velocity in each velocity bin to
correct for the different scale hights. According to Mayor et al.
(1977) the U and V velocities does not produce a
noticeable effect (meaning that the radial metallicity gradient is
low), thus only velocities are
usually considered.
From Fig. 6 it is clear that most of the stars have
velocities below
. There are 10 stars with
velocities above
. These stars have
between 1 and 2 kpc, and could be
either halo stars or the end of the disk velocity distribution. They
do not have exceptional metallicities. The remaining stars are
approximately gaussian distributed. A fitted exponential distribution
would predict no stars with
velocities above , which suggest that
this might be a way to separate the possible halo stars from the
sample.
![[FIGURE]](img72.gif) |
Fig. 6. Velocities perpendicular to the galactic plane versus metallicity.
|
Another result evident from this figure is that many stars have
very low velocities. This can cause
a problem when using conventional corrections such as weighting the
stars by their velocities; When one
star has a velocity of e.g.
and another has a
velocity of e.g.
, this will cause the second star to
have six times the weight of the first star, while in reality none of
them spend much, if any, time more than 40 pc from the galactic plane.
As seen in Fig. 6 there is only a very general trend for
to depend on [Fe/H]. This makes it
somewhat unreliable to use average values, but they will at least give
the general trend. Averaging the velocities in 0.1 [Fe/H] bins gives
Fig. 7. In the figure a linear fit is shown (with a dashed line).
Note though, that it suffers from the bad statistics in the low
metallicity part with 2-4 stars per bin, as opposed to
in the more metal rich part.
![[FIGURE]](img77.gif) |
Fig. 7. Average velocities perpendicular to the galactic plane versus metallicity.
|
Another possible correction is to use the f method from
Sommer-Larsen (1991). Using this method would ignore the velocity
data, which is not optimal as this discards useful information.
Another possibility is to use the calculated maximum height above
the plane. The distribution of is
shown in Fig. 8. There seem to be an exponential decay (a rough
guesstimate suggests a scale height of around 300 pc). The important
feature of the plot is that the maximum height of a considerable part
of the sample is comparable to the distance limit (40 pc). Thus
is not a good indicator of the time
the star spends inside our volume, as some stars inside the sample
will be near their and will
therefore have low velocities. These
low velocities (e.g. ) will give
extremely low weights with a standard correction method.
The correction is done by
assuming that the stars move vertically in a harmonic oscillator
potential. A harmonic oscillator potential is a fair approximation, as
long as z is small compared to the scale height of the disk,
and this is true for most of the sample (it is not the method used to
calculate , but for these purposes it
is acceptable). This method also assumes that the Sun is located in
the Galactic plane. While a more complete analysis would remove this
assumption is is used as it greatly simplifies the problem. With these
assumptions it is then easy to find the proportion of time spent
within 40 pc of the Galactic plane knowing the maximum distance that
the star reaches. Each star is then weighted with the reciprocal
time:
![[EQUATION]](img84.gif)
Eq. 1 is used, if the star reaches further than 40 pc away
from the Galactic plane. If it does not, its weight is set to one. For
the 33 stars where no velocity data were available, the correction
from the average values of was used,
normalized to the weights from the method described above.
Unfortunately this method is also prone to distortions from a few
stars. e.g. some stars gain weights of
, compared to
weight for a star that does not move
more than 40 pc from the Galactic plane. This is of the same order of
magnitude as the sample size and can be very disruptive. This problem
is compounded by the fact that the harmonic oscillator approximation
breaks down at large distances from the plane. Another problem is that
with the large scatter in velocities and the very few stars in the low
metallicity bins, this effect will primarily affect the bins with many
stars, as the bins with few stars will probably not have any extreme
stars. To rectify this problem all stars with
velocities above
were removed.
The different metallicity distributions that result from the
different corrections are shown in Fig. 9. The most interesting
point of this plot is that the distribution below
[Fe/H] does not change much, although
the Sommer-Larsen correction is a bit above the others. Another
interesting point is the position of the main "bulge". The bulge
shifts position with changing correction method. The difference
between the correction and the
truncated correction indicates that
the cut-off at does remove some of
the weighting, but as the distributions are comparable at lower
metallicities, the cut-off does not adversely affect the distribution.
As the distribution with cut-off is comparable to the other
corrections, it will be used.
![[FIGURE]](img94.gif) |
Fig. 9. Metallicity distribution of all remaining stars, with different scale height corrections applied. The solid line is the uncorrected sample, the dotted line is the sample corrected with the method and stars with removed, the dashed line is using the Sommer-Larsen correction, the dot-dashed line is with a linear correction and the dot-dot-dot-dashed line is with the method using all stars.
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |