Astron. Astrophys. 363, 1005-1012 (2000)
2. Equation of state and static strange star models
In the present paper we describe strange quark matter using the
model presented by Dey et al. (1998). In this model quarks of the
density dependent mass are confined at zero pressure and deconfined at
high density. The quark interaction is described by an interquark
vector potential originating from gluon exchange, and by a density
dependent scalar potential which restores the chiral symmetry at high
densities.
We start our calculation by noticing that the equations of state
SS1 and SS2 can be very well approximated by a linear function
- see Fig. 1:
![[EQUATION]](img11.gif)
with resulting from first law of
thermodynamics . We find it very
interesting that the equation of state based on rather complicated
physics can have a simple form like that of Eq. (1). In general,
the equation of the type (1) corresponds to self-bound matter at the
density (mass-energy) at zero
pressure and with a fixed sound velocity
( ). Thus equations of state SS1 and
SS2 are physical realizations of linear equations of state considered
previously, see e.g. Glendenning (1997). Such a parametrization is
very convenient - we not only can calculate the stellar structure for
stars described by equations of state SS1 and SS2 but also can use the
scaling relations to extend the results to stars described by the EOS
of the form given by Eq. (1). All stellar parameters are subject
to the scaling relations with appropriate powers of
for a fixed value of a (see
e.g. Witten 1984; Zdunik 2000).
![[FIGURE]](img9.gif) |
Fig. 1. Equations of state (the dependence of pressure in the units of dyne cm-2 on the density in the units of g cm-3) considered in this work; top panel - SS1, bottom panel - SS2. The thick solid line is the tabulated equation of state, and the dotted line is the linear approximation.
|
To calculate parameters a,
and we use a least squares fit
method taking into account the region of the densities, which is
relevant to the interior of stable stellar configurations, i.e we
neglect in the fitting the part of the EOS for densities larger than
the central density in the last stable configuration (maximum mass in
the non-rotating case). For the case of SS1 we obtained the values of
, ,
and for the case SS2 the values are
, ,
, see Fig. 1.
We have calculated the static stellar configurations using both the
tabulated equation of state of Dey et al. (1998) and its linear
approximation. The linear approximation agrees very well with
calculations of stellar parameters of non-rotating configurations
using the tabulated form of the EOS. The difference in the range of
masses and radii is smaller than 2%, and the maximum mass point agrees
within 0.2%.
We present the physical parameters for the maximum mass static
strange stars described by Eqs. SS1, SS2 in the left columns of
Table 1. The stars described by EOS SS1 and SS2 are very compact
i.e. the gravitational redshifts z for the maximum mass
configurations are much larger than those for SS within the MIT bag
model (also larger than z for most models of neutron stars),
for which z varies from 0.432 to 0.477 for a massive strange
quark with MeV and for massless
quarks respectively. The maximal baryon mass in the case of static
strange stars described by the SS1 and SS2 is relatively low (most of
the neutron star models have a maximum baryon mass close to
). In the case considered here the
difference between the baryon mass and the gravitational mass is much
higher ( and
) than in the case of neutron stars
(up to ) (for the MIT bag stars it is
). It should be however noted that in
the case of strange stars we calculate the total baryon mass of the
star using the nucleon mass and thus we include the binding energy of
strange matter with respect to nuclear matter.
![[TABLE]](img45.gif)
Table 1. Properties of the strange stars within the Dey model with maximal masses. The symbols are as follows: M and are gravitational and baryon masses respectively, is circumferential radius; is the central baryon density; is the central proper energy density divided by , P is the rotation period; , , are the redshift for an emission at the equator and in the direction of rotation, the redshift for an emission at the equator and in the direction opposite to rotation and the redshift at the stellar pole respectively.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |