Astron. Astrophys. 363, 1005-1012 (2000)
3. Rotating star configurations
We have calculated important properties of the uniformly rotating
strange stars described by the SS1 and SS2 equations of state using
the multi-domain spectral methods developed by Bonazzola et al. 1998.
This method has been used previously for calculating rapidly rotating
strange stars described by the MIT bag model (Gourgoulhon et al. 1999,
Zdunik et al., 2000b). The multi-domain technique allows one to
address the density discontinuity at the surface of self-bound stars
even with a very high .
We construct equilibrium sequences of rotating compact strange
stars with constant baryon mass, i.e. the so-called evolutionary
sequences (for example a pulsar keeps its baryon mass constant while
slowing down; neglecting accretion a compact star keeps its rest mass
constant during evolution). We identify normal and supramassive stars
as done for neutron stars. A sequence is called normal if it
terminates at the zero angular momentum limit with a static,
spherically symmetric solution, and it is called a supramassive
sequence if it does not. The boundary between these two sequences is
the sequence with the maximum baryon mass of a static configuration.
The angular momentum (and the central density) of a star changes
monotonically along each sequence. Note that the rotational frequency
f does not necessarily change monotonically along a sequence,
since a star changes its shape and, consequently, moment of inertia
with increasing angular momentum.
3.1. Equilibrium sequences
Stable solutions for rotating neutron stars have to satisfy four
different constraints (Cook et al. 1994): the static constraint - for
the normal evolutionary sequence of rotating stars, when angular
momentum goes to zero the configuration should be identical to the one
described by OV equations for the same baryon mass; the low mass
constraint below which a neutron star cannot form, the mass-shed
(Keplerian) constraint, and the constraint of stability to
quasi-radial perturbations.
The first three constraints provide bounds on normal sequences
stars (those are always stable to quasi-radial perturbations), while
the two last limits provide bounds on the supramassive stars.
The mass-shed limit is reached when the velocity at the equator of
a rotating star is equal to the velocity of an orbiting particle (a
star becomes unstable when gravitational attraction is not sufficient
to hold matter bound to the surface). For normal sequences of neutron
stars and low mass supramassive neutron stars, Keplerian
configurations are always these with the maximal rotational frequency.
For high mass supramassive neutron stars the Keplerian configuration
is the one with lowest rotational frequency in the sequence.
The fourth constraint is the requirement of stability to
axisymmetric perturbations. For an evolutionary sequence parameterized
by the central density, the model is (secularly) stable if
(or
) and unstable otherwise (Friedman et
al. 1986). The stability constraint imposes a limit which begins at
the maximum mass static configuration and terminates at the Keplerian
limit sequence near the maximum mass rotating configuration (see for
example gravitational mass versus central density dependence at
Fig. 1 in Cook et al. (1994). Normal sequences begin at the
static limit and terminate at the mass-shed limit. Along such
sequences angular momentum increases while central density decreases.
Supramassive star sequences begin at the stability limit with a
minimal angular momentum. As the angular momentum increases, the
central density decreases until the configuration terminates at the
Keplerian limit. The intersection of the mass-shed and the stability
limits on the gravitational mass - central density plane give us the
locations of the configuration rotating with maximum frequency. For
neutron stars the maximum mass Keplerian configuration is not
necessarily stable against axisymmetric perturbations. For some
equations of state of neutron stars the maximum mass configuration is
the same as the configuration with the maximum frequency.
3.2. Limits on gravitational mass
To find equilibrium sequences of compact strange stars we take only
three of the above constraints into account: the low mass constraint
is not relevant for self-bound mat- ter. Other instabilities (for
example to nonaxisymmetric perturbation) are not considered here since
we cannot study them with our numerical code. Taking into account all
con- straints described above we found limits on masses and rotation
frequencies for the SS2 model, shown as thick lines in Fig. 2.
The mass shed limit is shown as a thick short-dashed line, the
stability limit as long-dashed thick line, the fastest normal and low
mass supramassive configurations as a dot-dashed line, and the "low
rotational frequency" maximum mass configurations as a thick solid
line. The thin solid lines in Fig. 2 correspond to normal and
massive supramassive equilibrium evolutionary sequences and are
labelled with their baryon mass. In Fig. 3 we show an
evolutionary sequence with a baryon mass of
as an example of the low mass
supramassive stars (with baryon mass lower than 1.9
). The marginally stable
configurations with respect to quasi-radial perturbation is marked
with an open circle. The angular momen- tum increases along each curve
from for static configurations
( for supramassive stars) to
for the Keplerian ones represented
by filled circles for normal and low mass supramassive sequences. The
evolutionary sequence with separates
normal stars from the supramassive ones.
![[FIGURE]](img60.gif) |
Fig. 2. Gravitational mass as a function of the rotation frequency for the SS2 model. Thin solid lines correspond to evolutionary sequences with fixed baryon mass labelled close to each line. The angular momentum increases along each curve from for static configurations ( for supramassive stars) to for the Keplerian ones represented by filled circles for normal and low massive supramassive stars. The thick lines correspond to the upper limits on gravitational mass and rotational frequency; the dashed line corresponds to the mass-shed limit, the long-dashed line is the quasi-radial stability limit and the dashed-dotted line shows the fastest rotating configurations.
|
![[FIGURE]](img64.gif) |
Fig. 3. Limits on gravitational mass and on the rotation frequency and evolutionary supramassive sequences with rest mass 1.7 and 1.8 . All lines are as indicated in Fig. 2. The marginally stable configuration with respect to quasi-radial oscillation is shown as an open circle.
|
The maximum mass configuration is found by considering a sequence
of stars with a constant rotational frequency
and parameterized by the central
density. The maximum mass models for each sequence are represented by
thick lines in Fig. 4. Chosen sequences are shown as thin solid
lines. The Keplerian configurations are shown as a dashed line, while
marginally stable configurations with respect to quasi- radial
oscillation as long-dashed line. On one end of each sequence there is
a Keplerian configuration (with the lowest central density in the
sequence), and on the other end the last stable configuration with
respect to axisymmetric perturbations (the densest object in the
sequence). For kHz the maximum mass
configuration (shown as thick solid line) for each sequence is close
to the marginally stable one. For fast rotating configurations,
kHz the maximum mass configurations
are the Keplerian ones (for comparison see Fig. 1b in
Gondek-Rosinska et al. 2000 for strange stars described by the MIT bag
model).
![[FIGURE]](img71.gif) |
Fig. 4. Gravitational mass vs. radius for stars described by the SS2 model. The thin solid lines correspond to sequences of stars with constant rotational frequency . The rotational frequency is labelled close to each line. The thick lines (solid and short-dashed) correspond to configurations with the maximal mass in each sequence. The dashed line corresponds to the mass-shed limit and the long dashed line is the quasi-radial stability limit. The intersection of the mass-shed and the stability limits gives the location of the configuration rotating with maximum frequency.
|
The thick solid line and thick short dashed line in Fig. 2
correspond to the maximal gravitational mass of a rotating strange
star described by the SS2 equation of state as a function of the
rotational frequency. There are two cases as the rotational frequency
increases, first for rotational frequencies lower than
(in the case of the SS2 model) and
second for . In the first case the
maximal mass limit line goes very close to the stability limit (shown
as thin long dashed line). For rotation frequencies lower than
kHz the stellar configuration is
only slightly affected by rotation - the increase in the maximal mass
is only a second order effect (where both the maximum mass line and
the normal evolutionary sequence with maximum baryon mass are very
close to each other) ie. , where
is the static mass configuration.
For higher frequencies increases
faster. The maximum mass of rotating compact strange star in this case
is approximately greater than the
maximum mass of a static stellar configuration. For
kHz we see a strong increase in the
maximum mass (thick dashed line). In this case the configurations with
maximum mass are Keplerian. The maximum mass of a rotating compact
strange star in this regime (the maximum allowed mass of rotating
configurations) is greater than the
maximum mass of a static stellar configuration.
Note that the maximal mass configurations for a given rotational
frequency are always supramassive i.e. no static configuration with
such a mass can exist. It is worth noting that the central density of
the rotating configurations is always lower than the central density
of the maximum mass static star. This makes us confident that the
rotating configurations found with the use of theapproximation of
Eq. 1 are at least as accurate as the static configuration
calculations.
3.3. Limits on rotational frequency
Let us now consider upper limits on rotational frequency of compact
strange stars. In the case of high mass supramassive stars the maximum
rotational frequency is determined by the condition of stability to
axisymmetric perturbations, shown as a thick long dashed line in
Fig. 2. Similarly to the supramassive neutron stars, the
configurations to the left of this line are stable to radial collapse
- they spin up loosing their angular momentum as discussed by Cook et
al. (1994) in the case of supramassive neutron stars and by
Gourgoulhon et al. (1999) in the case of supramassive MIT bag model
strange stars.
In the case of normal and low mass supramassive stars, the maximum
rotational frequency is slightly above the rotation frequency of the
Keplerian configuration. The fastest configurations are shown as a
thick dash-dotted line in Fig. 2 while the Keplerian one by
filled circles. In Fig. 3 we present the details of the
intermediate region of Fig. 2 for
to show low mass supramassive star
sequences.
The rotational frequency decreases for large values of the angular
momentum and the sequences turn back in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3
before reaching the Keplerian configuration. At this small part of an
evolutionary sequence, configurations spin up by loosing the angular
momentum (or slow down when obtaining the angular momentum). The
mass-shed configurations are reached due to the increase of the
equatorial radius relative to the deformation of the rotating star.
The difference between the Keplerian frequency and the maximal
rotation frequency for these evolutionary sequences SS2 model is of
the order of . Such a phenomenon was
discussed by Zdunik et al. (2000b) in the case of normal sequences of
MIT bag model strange stars. It is interesting to note that no such
behavior was noticed for neutron stars. This feature is characteristic
of stars described by a self-bound linear EOS.
The mass shed limit and the stability limit lines intersect twice:
at frequency kHz and at the frequency
of kHz. The intersection of the
mass-shed limit (solid thick line in Fig. 2) and stability limit
(solid dashed line in Fig. 2) determines the configuration
rotating with maximum allowed frequency. Note that the maximum
frequency occurs for only one extreme supramassive model and that this
model is at the mass-shed limit and stability limit.
The configuration with the absolute maximum mass lies on the
Keplerian limit line. Note that the maximum mass configuration is not
rotating with the maximum allowed rotational frequency. For both SS1
an SS2 models the maximum mass rotating configuration is on the stable
side of the mass-shed limit line.
In Fig. 5 we present the regions of the parameter space given
by mass and rotation frequency where strange stars described by the
SS1 (dashed line) and SS2 (solid line) equations of state can exist.
The maximal mass and maximal frequency configurations lie on the
Keplerian limit line. Details of the Keplerian configurations with the
maximum mass are given in the right columns of Table 1. The
maximum mass of rotating strange star given by SS1 and SS2 model is
larger
( the equatorial radius) than in the
case of a non-rotating star with maximum mass. For strange stars with
massless and not interacting quarks these values are
and
respectively. The ratios of masses
and equatorial radii
do not depend on the parameter
, since static and rotating maximum
mass configurations scale identically, and are functions only of
a (sound velocity) in the case of stars described by
Eq. (1).
![[FIGURE]](img92.gif) |
Fig. 5. Limits on gravitational mass and the rotation frequency for SS1 (dashed lines) and SS2 (solid lines).
|
For neutron stars the maximum mass which can be supported when the
star is rotating uniformly increases by
to
depending on the equation of state while the radius increases by
to
(e.g. Cook et al. 1994; Datta et al. 1998) We note that a large
increase (higher than in the case of neutron stars) of the maximum
mass and corresponding equatorial radius in the case of strange stars
of different EOS due to rotation is related to the fact that these EOS
are self-bound with a very high density at the surface. They are much
more compact than neutron stars and much higher rotation frequencies
are required to deform them to reach Keplerian configurations.
3.4. ratio for rotating strange stars
It has been shown by Gourgoulhon et al. (1999), Stergioulas et al.
(1999) and Gondek-Rosinska et
al. (2000) (where in addition to the treatment of first two papers,
mass and interaction between quarks were taken into account) that
can be very high for strange stars
described by the MIT bag model. In Fig. 6 we present the ratio of
the rotational kinetic energy to the absolute value of the
gravitational potential energy for
evolutionary sequences for SS2 model. Each sequence is labeled with
its baryon mass. The thin dashed line corresponds to the sequence of
configurations rotating with the same rotational frequency. Note that
for a rotating strange star the value of
is significantly higher than that for
an ordinary NS (eg. Cook et al. 1994). The large value of
results from a flat density profile
combined with strong equatorial flattening of rapidly rotating strange
stars. It increases as mass decreases for Keplerian configurations.
This property is universal for all self-bound linear EOS.
does not depend on
and its dependence on a is
very weak. We can easily obtain a similar diagram for the simplest MIT
model EOS of SS using the scaling relations
,
(Stergioulas et al 1999, for Keplerian configurations), where the
subscript D denotes the EOS considered here. We check that the
above scaling relations hold for any model in the evolutionary
sequences. The difference in mass and rotational frequency between
numerical results and rescaled ones are of the order of
and
. The value of
is quite large for all configurations
close to Keplerian, so it is possible that the point of onset of
secular instability to non-axisymmetric normal modes has already been
passed. For mass-shed configurations
varies from 0.21 for maximum mass configuration to 0.27 for the low
mass one (0.25 and 0.26 for gravitational mass 1.4
for SS1 and SS2 Keplerian models).
This could be an indicator that rapidly rotating SS may constitute
strong sources of gravitational waves (Gourgoulhon et al. 1999;
Gondek-Rosinska et al. 2000;
Gondek-Rosinska &
Gourgoulhon 2000).
![[FIGURE]](img104.gif) |
Fig. 6. The ratio of the rotational kinetic energy to the absolute value of the gravitational potential energy for SS2 evolutionary sequences with fixed baryon mass labelled above each line in sollar mass units. The solid thick line corresponds to Keplerian configurations. The thin dashed line correspond to sequences of configuration rotating with the same rotational frequency. Models located to left and below of this line rotate with lower frequency.
|
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |